Reading the abstract will help you decide if the article was what you were looking for, or not, without spending a long time reading the whole paper. The abstract is that dense first paragraph at the very beginning of a paper. However, the reader is informed that this paper is mainly intended for the amateur reader unaccustomed to scientific literature and not for the professional interested in critical appraisal of journal articles. But when it is an area that I know very little about, I read these closely because then I learn a lot about the assumptions and explanatory approaches in that area of research. These types of articles are a good starting place for a summary of what has been happening in the field.
Reading a single paper may take you a very long time at first, but be patient with yourself. Scientific words have extremely precise meanings. Select three of the five recommendations from the practice guide that increase reading comprehension for young readers. Look closely for evidence of agenda-motivated research. Most relevant points would be things that change your thinking about your research topic or give you new ideas and directions. This means that once you've read the literature and know what people have already discovered, you'll probably be able to see what still needs to be done in the field and use that to design your own relevant research project.
Reading a book is somewhat different. Hi Jennifer: A colleague sent me this link to the guide for reading a scientific paper. Materials and Methods The materials and methods section gives the technical details of how the experiments were carried out, including the types of controls used and where unusual resources like a bacterial strain or a publicly available data set were obtained. Third, I check to see if there is a Perspective by another scientist. Most readers prefer titles that are descriptive and self-explanatory without having to look at the entire article to know what it is all about.
Then I usually read the entire article from beginning to end, going through the sections in the order they appear so that I can follow the flow of work that the authors want to communicate. That just mucks it all up and adds to the confusion that at least some kinds of hypotheses can be written as predictions. Are there any specific units that are used? Reading a research article can be a frustrating experience, especially for the one who has not mastered the art of reading scientific literature. Having a mentor to help evaluate ideas and provide background information is extremely useful. To appreciate the choice of a statistical test, one requires an understanding of the hypothesis being tested. I pay attention to acknowledgement of limitations and proper inference of data.
What benefits or problems are identified? Read the Abstract An abstract summarizes the basic content of a scholarly article or research paper. Typically, this section concludes with identification of gaps in the literature and how these gaps stimulated the researcher to design a new study. The test sequencing is quite clever, but very complicated. There should also be a discussion about how the solution is achieved designed and implemented or is at least achievable. Questions to ask yourself while reading the discussion and conclusion sections include what does the study mean and why is it important? Usually the study results are compared with other studies, explaining in what aspects they were different or similar. In general, scientific literature can be primary or secondary. How is this research unique? Moreover, the reasons for writing the paper may be different than the reasons the paper has been assigned, meaning you have to work harder to find the content that you are interested in.
For all these reasons, reading a research paper can require a special approach. In these Strategies for Reading, the teacher divides the classroom into small groups of four to six readers and then the teacher can visit each group to provide additional instruction and make sure that the students understand the reading material. In general, the research has found support for both the -based and whole-language based. This assignment uses a rubric. When something really catches my interest, I will read some of the internal details.
Oftentimes, one or more of these elements are not explicitly stated, making your job more difficult. Internet searches for tutorials or explanations about a specific method or concept can also be useful. You may find it productive to try to answer each question in turn, writing your answer down. Does it give you anything useful? But if you aren't familiar with the topic, or if skimming reveals terms or concepts you don't understand, you'll need to read the introduction and then the methods section carefully, stopping to consult other resources or cited literature to augment your understanding. Then, I skim the introduction and flip through the article to look at the figures.
This is not only to keep abreast of progress in the speciality concerned but also to be aware of current trends in providing optimum healthcare to the patients. Then, if the authors' research is similar to my own, I see if their relevant data match our findings or if there are any inconsistencies. You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. If a decision is made to read the entire article, the key elements of the article can be perused in a systematic manner effectively and efficiently. And they often contain more background information than primary research articles do, which means if at any point you're confused while reading the primary literature, it will help to go back and look at reviews.
The abstract can be read in a systematic way by answering certain fundamental questions like what was the study about, why and how was the study conducted, the results and their inferences. Then take mut-adequate test sets and compare with their technique. Go read , then go back to my last post and read one of the papers that I linked to like and try to identify the null hypotheses in it. And last, but not least, studying the figures will help you understand how to represent your own data in a way that is clear, accurate, and in keeping with the standards in that particular field of science. The scientific literature is burgeoning at an exponential rate. And don't forget that people, like mentors and science teachers, can also be great resources when you're stuck.